August 4, 2009
Dear Senator:
I am writing to urge you to consider this: voting for the Second Amendment is a lot more important than voting in favor of a Latina for Supreme Court.
My wife was born in Latin America and came to this country legally. Later, she decided to become an American citizen because she believes in the principles underlying the Constitution of this country.
She is disgusted with the campaign that would have you vote for Judge Sonia Sotomayor because the judge is an Hispanic. Hispanics do not vote as a bloc. It is offensive to suggest that they do. Those promoting Sotomayor have too often resorted to that kind of insulting rhetoric.
Gun Owners of America will rate a vote against Sotomayor as a vote FOR the Constitution of the United States which you swore to uphold -- a document which she has voted to disregard on numerous occasions.
Conversely, a vote for Sonia Sotomayor will be seen as a preference for ethnic identity over the rule of law.
That is why your vote will be so heavily weighted by Gun Owners of America.
Sincerely,
Larry Pratt
Executive Director
The U.S. Senate came two votes short of passing a concealed carry reciprocity provision introduced by Republican Senators John Thune (SD) and David Vitter (R-LA). The language would have allowed people who are authorized to carry in their home states to carry their firearms in other states, as well. Even though the Thune amendment garnered more than a majority (58-39), a parliamentary maneuver required 60 votes to pass the measure.
The Heller decision affirmed that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms. The Thune/Vitter amendment will simply protect the right of citizens to carry firearms outside of their home state without violating the rights of the other states. Thus, the reciprocity language protects the principle of federalism while also protecting the Second Amendment rights of
It was disappointing to fall two votes short on this amendment,” said